Written by Ken De'Ora About 5 years ago, after some positive experiences with GIS in the field as an archaeologist, I began exploring the potential for a new career revolving around interests in understanding the inner-working capabilities of mobile technologies, and the way they assist information management. But before jumping right into the GIS certificate at PCC, an influential internship in historic preservation provided me with insights into how indoor mapping and modeling could stand to be more efficient. Painstakingly measuring architectural details can be slow going without the right tools, and if you miss a deadline it can affect your project negatively. Along with this problem, not being able to share my data the way I wanted to, took considerable attention away from peers I wanted to have review it. To be specific, at the time I finished my work, the most efficient way to share it was either to pay for a larger amount of space on a service like DropBox to host my report, or I could just pay Kinko’s to print it out and I could mail it to them. Because of this scenario, within the context of our class on web map design, I figured talking about new developments in web sharing and storage of LiDAR data could be appropriate. For some time now, companies like Autodesk and FARO have had their own scanning software for users (such as ReCap 360 and SCENE) to be used in conjunction with LiDAR instruments. Customers like NASA, Volvo, Johnson and Johnson, and others, use them for creating “as-built” data (data that’s finished being messed with and ready to be built), for mapping, and for asset management or project execution, which tend to require quite a bit of space on a drive. Until recently, that meant putting it on the web was more time consuming and costly, because those customers would have to own and maintain their own internet servers to host their individual projects. But today, progress in cloud-based hosting has allowed FARO, Autodesk, and even smaller companies, to host the servers for their subscribers securely and increase the customer accessibility of very large datasets, like point-cloud information. Because of cloud-based data storage, computers can access data entirely from within a web browser. And not only do most cloud-based environments allow for storage but many of them allow additional functionality to be able to do things like access libraries and caches to add to your project and customize the image. The only downside is that these are obviously for profit companies, so their instrumentation is expensive as is there software. There is open source and open access software out there, but what I found was only for geophysical and geological data, exhibiting interactive topography, but primarily for plate tectonics. Also, since they’ve been compiled by academics, not marketing geniuses, they don’t seem intuitive. However, the hosting and software architecture for them is interesting to explore. Briefly, Cesium is an open-source 3D processing AND cloud-based hosting environment that, along with JQuery allows GPlates Portal to present their data on plate reconstructions. Cesium uses a Javascript library that is built off a derivative of OpenGL 3.3 (called Web Graphics Library) to produce interactive 2D maps and 3D globes in your browser. Your browser can then access the WebGL API as a Document Object Model, which then interfaces with HTML5 and CSS elements to allow for a faster 3D image to render. All of this is based on logic and data layers (such as a python framework, HTTP server and GIS datasets) which rest in Amazon’s cloud system. I can only assume this is how FARO and Autodesk do it as well, but slight differences, with much broader flexibility to their functionality and for a much smaller scoped project. Ok, that’s all I wanted to say! Sorry this is so long. I sort of didn’t know where to stop. Or what would be interesting, or dry. Hopefully, these following links will address anything I missed or satiate any curiosity. http://www.spar3d.com/news/software/vol14no10-faro-releases-scene-webshare-cloud-2-0/ http://www.autodesk.com/products/recap-360/overview https://cesiumjs.org/ http://portal.gplates.org/ Müller, R. Dietmar, et al. "The Gplates Portal: Cloud-Based Interactive 3D Visualization Of Global Geophysical And Geological Data In A Web Browser." Plos ONE 11.3 (2016): 1-17. Academic Search Premier. Web. 9 Apr. 2016.
4 Comments
Mike Holscher
4/13/2016 03:28:57 pm
Do you have a Jpeg or PDF of any of the mapping you completed? The indoor mapping concept would be cool to implement in the Portland Shanghai Tunnels. I smell a final project brewing in this blog.
Reply
Ken De'Ora
4/15/2016 08:48:34 am
The internship didn't provide an actual instrumentation or software for me to do my mapping. I just happened to be taking AutoCAD at a community college at the time. So I used my budding knowledge in that to add interest to my report and show renovations for each level. I actually attempted to individually measure each and every facet of that house (all 4 stories of it) but unsurprisingly, doing it by hand without architectural guidance lend to human error and imprecision. In the end my indoor maps had to be classified as "not to scale" since deadlines had to be met. So, I could provide mapping of that home, but I dont know how useful it would be...
Reply
3/15/2017 11:07:15 pm
Excellent article. Very interesting to read. I really love to read such a nice article. Thanks! keep rocking.
Reply
4/9/2017 12:47:22 pm
Running a company, whether it is considered a small business or a large corporation, entails the use of information technology applications and infrastructure. Without these in place, productivity will not be as progressive as expected.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorBlog posts are written by students in the Interactive Map Design course at Portland Community College. Archives
June 2018
Categories |